Cindy Miller, Poetry workshop
Reflection on workshop
I
have always been someone who writes, so naturally, poems were in my list of
things I did. Now, I don’t know how good
I was or anything, but I tried. If the
poem is supposed to rhyme, I can make it rhyme.
And if it’s not, then that doesn’t matter. Now, I do not believe that my particular
strength lies in poems. I’m more of a
story person. But, poems and songs are
sometimes a release for me. Personally,
that’s my favorite way to write poems. I
like to rhyme, but I know that isn’t necessary. I like that the workshop kind of forces you
to look at certain poems in a certain way.
But unlike grade school/or high school, you don’t get chided because you
stink at writing a particular kind of poem.
You go back and revise it the best you can, and when you choose poems to
review, you pick a different poem.
Poems, mostly, are in the eye of the beholder. Not everyone likes the same thing. Some people only like poems that rhyme. Some hate end rhyme. But that’s why we have so many different
poets and writers.
I
really like having the critiques because other people actually get to read your
poem and look at it. They make their own
meanings out of it, but in the end, you get to tell them what you were
thinking. They get to correct you, and
ask you questions about your work.
Usually, no one is too judgmental—as far as in critiquing you, and
that’s because they know that they have to be critiqued too. Critiques force you to think about the
poem.
I
have learned a lot about different techniques, as far as writing poems. It doesn’t always have to be the same, and
different techniques can really brighten up the poem. I know I will use the
things I learned.
I
am not the kind of person who likes to overthink poems. Sometimes in a poetry class, you’re forced to
do that, which is probably good. I don’t
enjoy it, but I can do it.
Overall,
I find it easier to pick my own topic for an exercise. It’s too hard to get a topic and write about
it. Usually, you’re supposed to know
something about what you’re writing. I
write about things I know, or things that everybody kind of knows. Sometimes ideas are easier to write about
than things.
One
of the things I didn’t like about being in a poetry workshop is that sometimes
it’s hard to think of ideas, but you have to and sometimes your poem isn’t as
good because of it… But usually it’s pretty fair.
I
found that I’m not someone who likes to write poems with strong metaphors. I like to allude to things, sometimes using
similes, but metaphors, to me, are a pain.
They take too long to come up with, and sometimes they only appeal to
you or a general audience. I find it
hard to use images and sense data in my poems together sometimes. But other times, I think it’s hard when I
just have to do one of them. It just
depends. I think this course has kind of
helped me in that way. Now, I can at
least make something up in the guidelines, and then try to make it better even
though it isn’t really my strength.
I
think I include too many details in some instances and not enough in others. In my poem that was originally not done
right, which was the scent poem, I accidentally did both the scents and the
images, so I had to go back and re-do it.
I find it hard to keep on describing things, because, personally, it annoys
me to read something with a lot of description.
I’m like, “Give me dialogue, give me the run-down on what’s happening in
the scene. I don’t need fourteen lines
about the yellow chair.” But that’s my opinion.
As
far as reading poems, I can appreciate things for what they are. All the poems we read as a class, like the
critiques, I enjoyed. I usually saw what
the poet was meaning to do with the poem, and besides a few minor things, I
didn’t have an issue with it. Now, there
are classic examples of good poetry, and of bad, but I try to take the poem and
the poet for what they are, and not try to make it something it isn’t.
Sometimes I tell people that I like the poem as is—but if they were to write
another version, it might be a “better poem”.
While
the poem about the starving girl was good, I thought it was strange how it’s
talking about poverty, and then it starts talking about puberty. I didn’t really like that. I liked the William Carlos Williams poem, the
one we wrote the “Dedication to a Plot of Ground” poem about. It was a cool little story and I liked
it. It was interesting, and even though
you had to think about some of the lines to get what he meant and how it
pertained to the story, it wasn’t too hard to understand, and it stayed on
topic. We are reading it as a funeral of
some kind, and so it summed up the person’s life in a nice little
gift-wrapping, which is the poem. I
thought that was cool. And that’s
probably why the version of the story that I wrote is one of my favorites.
No comments:
Post a Comment